Ever wonder when someone joins this group and then posts a
controversial post and then doesn't respond when things flare up?
A few years back there was a similar(not the same topic) occurance and
in that post the writer gave a few more clues to their identity. I was
able to track them down to a "Gamers" site. The site had several
players posting their results about how successful they had been in
developing their personas. They played games with various groups and
actually counted their conquests as we would count our 'finds'.
Stirring the pot on a letterboxers site could be considered as a count.
I have no reason to believe that Joy Kelley's post was from a gamer as
I haven't really tried to track it down, but the timing and limited
information included is a bit suspect.
Targeting game playing letterboxers could certainly be high on a
conquest list? If it is legitimate then there should be more info forth
coming. Naming the charitable organization would be just the start.
Don
Interesting Posts
2 messages in this thread |
Started on 2007-05-06
Interesting Posts
From: gwendontoo (foxsecurity@earthlink.net) |
Date: 2007-05-06 04:10:57 UTC
Re: [LbNA] Interesting Posts
From: Clio Mouse (cliomouse@yahoo.com) |
Date: 2007-05-06 00:19:38 UTC-07:00
Don, you've always got your head above the crowd. And not just because you're a little on the tall side. Keep callin' 'em like you see 'em.
ClioMouse
gwendontoo wrote:
Ever wonder when someone joins this group and then posts a
controversial post and then doesn't respond when things flare up?
A few years back there was a similar(not the same topic) occurance and
in that post the writer gave a few more clues to their identity. I was
able to track them down to a "Gamers" site. The site had several
players posting their results about how successful they had been in
developing their personas. They played games with various groups and
actually counted their conquests as we would count our 'finds'.
Stirring the pot on a letterboxers site could be considered as a count.
I have no reason to believe that Joy Kelley's post was from a gamer as
I haven't really tried to track it down, but the timing and limited
information included is a bit suspect.
Targeting game playing letterboxers could certainly be high on a
conquest list? If it is legitimate then there should be more info forth
coming. Naming the charitable organization would be just the start.
Don
---------------------------------
Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
ClioMouse
gwendontoo
Ever wonder when someone joins this group and then posts a
controversial post and then doesn't respond when things flare up?
A few years back there was a similar(not the same topic) occurance and
in that post the writer gave a few more clues to their identity. I was
able to track them down to a "Gamers" site. The site had several
players posting their results about how successful they had been in
developing their personas. They played games with various groups and
actually counted their conquests as we would count our 'finds'.
Stirring the pot on a letterboxers site could be considered as a count.
I have no reason to believe that Joy Kelley's post was from a gamer as
I haven't really tried to track it down, but the timing and limited
information included is a bit suspect.
Targeting game playing letterboxers could certainly be high on a
conquest list? If it is legitimate then there should be more info forth
coming. Naming the charitable organization would be just the start.
Don
---------------------------------
Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]